31 July 2016

Mike Smith endorses the Cape Party




By Mike Smith
31st of July 2016

Amazing how the ANC is losing support from all their former diehard supporters of whom one would never have thought it to possible .

Oliver Tambo’s family abandons ANC

Thabo Mbeki and 14 of his family members abandon the ANC

Former ANC terrorist, Minister of Safety and Security and later Minister of Sport, Steve Tshwete’s son Linda and Ghaleb Cachalia, the son of struggle icons Amina and Yusuf, held a media briefing condemning President Jacob Zuma’s “racial” campaign.

The three men who come from prominent families in the ANC said they have the full support of their families as DA members. Linda said his entire family, except for the two, fully supported him when he joined the DA.

Malema said that the ANC has blamed Apartheid for its failures for too long: EFF: ANC has blamed Apartheid for its failures too long

He said: “This is no longer the ANC of Mandela, Tambo and Chris Hani. You must not feel ashamed for not voting for the ANC, because that party is now rotten.”

There is no doubt that the ANC is going to get a slap upside their heads in this election, but what is disheartening for me is that the winners of the lost ANC votes will be the DA and the EFF.

Cape Party: Main Road Somerset West
As you know, I have never belonged to any political party and have voted only once (1994) in my life. That was a mistake, because at the time I didn’t realize that the election was illegal and every subsequent election after that is therefore also illegal.

After the NP repealed the populations registration act on the 28th of June 1991 (the last of the Apartheid laws) they scrapped the denotations of “Whites”, “Coloureds”, “Indians” and “Blacks” and all citizens became the same. Therefore the Tri-cameral parliament, the Constitution of 1983 and their mandate to govern became null and void. The NP should have resigned there and then, called for a new election and a new constitution.

Only the whites voted for them in 1989. They had no mandate from the majority population (non whites) to govern one day further. They didn’t even have the authority to call a whites-only referendum in 1992; they should have simply fucked off.

Therefore the elections of 1994 were illegal and a farce and every single subsequent election the same.

Nevertheless, the majority of the voters in South Africa does not know this and choose to play along. I don’t. I don’t endorse an illegal terrorist government by voting in any of their elections.

Cape Party: Beach Road Strand
However, for those who are going to vote on the 3rd of Agust 2016, please vote for the Cape Party. It is the only party I will endorse, because the DA, the Freedom Front Minus, and The rest of the 200 parties in the farcical elections do not support an independent country or homeland separate from the ANC governed shithole of the rest of SA.

Besides, the hated liberal media is freezing out the tiny Cape Party and Jack Miller, party leader is fighting to get just 5000 votes in order to get ONE SEAT in order to have a say in running of the Western Cape.

Often that is all that is needed. Remember the impact the lone voice of Helen Suzmann had in parliament during Apartheid. Eventually she turned the whole NP liberal to the point where the Conservative Party became the official opposition.

Just look at me. A lone voice crying out in the wilderness and the impact that has had.

Maybe all we need is that one voice in the Cape Parliament to constantly plant the seeds of freedom and independence in the minds of the people. If the Cape becomes independent then it will be the catalyst for the Boer Republics to also be restored and for the Zulus to get Natal.

But why stop at 5000 votes? Give them 10,000 votes; Hell man, give them 500,000 votes!!!! On the 3rd of August, vote Cape Party and get them all elected, but at least get Jack Miller and Ebrahim Davids in there.




Cape Party: Gordons Bay


Jack Miller and Ebrahim Davids



30 July 2016

The African on democracy, dictatorship and corruption. Understanding what the 2016 local elections mean to blacks




By Mike Smith
31st of July 2016

It is (local) elections week and the ANC seems to be in a bit of trouble.

In Kwa-Zulu Natal several ANC nominated candidates were murdered by ANC “voters” who wanted others. Nothing new in Africa. It is nothing but racist tribal infighting. Fully normal; Zulu’s don’t want Xhosas, Pedis or Sothos to be their councillors and vice versa.

The Afrikaans media mentioned that the army and police have been put on standby because the ANC stand a good chance of losing former major strongholds in three metros (Pretoria Johannesburg and Port Elizabeth). Large scale violence is anticipated.

Election hanging in the balance

Of course the ANC is going to go on a rampage when they lose. The ANC is only interested in democracy when THEY can win. I have said it many times before: Democracy is wasted on blacks.

It is a foreign concept to them. They don’t understand it and they don’t want it. The blacks want a CHIEF. A “main ou”. A dictator...and so what if he is corrupt?

Today when liberals look back at the Homelands system or the “Bantustans” as the media dubbed it then they are quick to snidely point out that those were “corrupt dictatorships”, but as my article from 17th of October 2014 pointed out, blacks don’t mind dictatorships. They don’t mind corruption.

Zuma described corruption as a Western Paradigm and even if it was a crime, a crime where there are “no victims”.

As the Nigerian newspaper above reported, “Zuma’s standpoint is similar to the position of Nigeria’s president Goodluck Jonathan, who described corruption as mere common stealing, perhaps undeserving of the opprobrium attached to it internationally.”

You can try to explain this to Western White Liberals and they will cringe, press their hands of their ears and close their eyes, because they believe they can teach blacks about democracy.

Reality check: Look at Africa. It has failed every single time. Every single black state has gone back to dictatorship, because what liberals don’t get is that “Democracy” is NOT the natural form of government for Africans; “Dictatorship” is the natural form of government for blacks.

In 2014 I tried to explain this African mindset in this article: Julius Nyerere and the mind of the African

You can read my article of 17th of October 2014 for the full details of how Julius Nyerere, the former dictator of Tanzania, one of the “Great liberators” of Africa and whom blacks call the “Teacher of Africa” introduced his African Socialist policies of ”Ujamaa” (oneness, togetherness) which the ANC calls ‘Ubuntu’ and how it plunged Tanzania into a failed state status and abject poverty.

In that article I also mentioned how, according to Nyerere, it is only the West who calls the absence of an opposition a “Dictatorship”.

Six months after The Arusha Declaration of 1967, he held a few “teach-in” lectures (communist propaganda sessions) at the University College of Dar es Salaam where he explained what he meant in more detail. My source is the book, “Africa and the West, Vol2”, page 157-167.

According to Nyerere ‘Democracy’ in its finest form is the will of the people or like Abraham Lincoln said at the Gettysburg address and repeated in the French constitution: “government of the people, for the people and by the people”. ("gouvernement du peuple, par le peuple et pour le peuple").

So if the people prefer a corrupt dictatorship, then that wish should be respected as “Democracy”.

See? Liberals always think they can turn blacks into idealistic carbon copies of themselves and they always think that blacks have the same needs and wants as whites. All blacks need is a little bit of education, a little shove in the right direction and they will be just as whites.

Nothing is further from the truth. You have to accept blacks the way they are, accept the fact that they are vastly different to whites and that their cultures, beliefs and values are different and incompatible with that of White Western Civilization. There can never be any compromise between the two and the solutions are actually quite simply; Total eradication of one by the other or total separation.

Now before all those white liberals choke on their daily brainfood of cinnamon covered applesauce and compliment me by calling me a “racist” (as if they mean it is something bad) let me quote Vusamzulu “Credo” Mutwa, the Zulu Sangoma, on how blacks see democracy. I am quoting from his book, “Indaba my children” (original 1964, 1999 edition) which the Sunday Times called “A work of genius”.

Book IV, the chapter – “The knowledge of the Bantu – General”, Page 655-656

-Start of quote-

“Many of those interested in events in Africa today are surprised that the new emergent African states do not settle for the perfect democratic form of government with a recognized opposition, but that they all turn into dictatorships.

The truth is that the black man cannot fathom how a country can be governed by two enemies constantly at one another’s throats. Such a country can never be happy and stable.

To a black man all disagreements must end in blows and secession. The black man has not the shallow flexible soul that most races have, and to be ruled by two squabbling parties is as alien and repugnant to his mind, as his way of doing things is repugnant to the European mind.

A black man can give his loyalty only to one set of rulers, who rule in oneness of purpose for better or for worse. Sooner or later they find the dual loyalty encouraged by a two-party system not only clumsy and unwieldy, but fatal as well, because to an African a member of the opposition is not merely the man who holds dissenting political views – he is a deadly enemy who must be killed.

Things like ‘friendly rivalry’ and an ‘agreement to disagree’ have no place in the mind of an African. We either hate or we love; we either agree or we disagree and fight to the death.

The black man has a strong parent, or fetish complex, dating from the days when a community could produce only one brave man at a time, who could challenge a savage beast with a bone-tipped spear.

The whole community then looked upon such a hero for its protection. Even today we still choose that one man or woman who will be our living totem pole, our god on earth, our parent symbol; who is the embodiment of all our aspirations and our unity, and to whom we shall give all our love and loyalty and around whom we shall rally in times of evil. This person will be our nation, the symbol of all our ideals and all our dreams. He or she shall be part of us and we shall be part of him or her.

Therefore in the mind of the African, there can only be one ruler to whom all loyalty and love is given, and not two. One is unity and two are disunity.”

-End of quote-:



29 July 2016

A big thank you from the ANC for your campaign contributions

By Mike Smith
30th of July 2016

Just in case you were wondering what happens to all your hard earned tax money...Wasted on the ANC's campaign.

This picture was taken and sent in by a regular reader near Hazyview last weekend.


Divine backing of the ANC: The Gods must be crazy


By Mike Smith
29th of July 2016

Just the other day The ANC’s Gwede Mantashe said the ANC is God’s chosen party and that the ANC was personally anointed by God to rule South Africa.

I don’t know so much about that, but I do know that God sometimes moves in mysterious ways. It could be that God is setting them up for a big fall, but they have that base covered, because when God fails them, then they have the dead ancestors behind them. Zuma said: Vote ANC or the ancestors will punish you

“The ancestors are turning their backs against you if you leave the ANC and you will have bad luck,” he said at an election rally in Letlhabile near Brits.

“They [opposition parties] know they will not win – why should you waste your vote on them?” he asked.

So if Zuma is so sure that the ANC will win then why does he still bother to tell them to vote for the ANC? Who needs a stupid vote if God already anointed you to rule and the ancestors are backing you?

However there could be a conflict of interests, because the clergy, God’s representatives here on earth or the whores of Satan, are not backing the corrupt terrorist ANC anymore…that they helped to bring to power during Apartheid with their Satanic “Liberation Theology”. Catholic bishops want voters to send politicians a warning message and tell them that they are tired of corruption

The mayor of Cape Town, who was once a PAC terrorist herself, said that Zuma was possessed by Satan. De Lille says: Zuma is possessed by the Devil

Judging from how much money the ANC is spending on their election campaign…I would say they are also backed by Mammon and if you watch the cringe worthy Al Jazeera interview with International Relations and Co-operation Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, I would say that Bacchus/Dionysus is also in the bed with the ANC somewhere.
ANC election campaign hits R1Billion

However if you look at how the ANC is losing ground in the major Metros ...then I would say that the god Cronus is calling time on their asses and Hades is waiting down there with a moerse big fork.

All I know is that God cannot possibly back the ANC, because in Job 15:31 God tells us why we should never vote for the ANC…."Let him not trust in emptiness, deceiving himself; For emptiness will be his reward.”

And I am sure that in 1 Samuel 12:21 God had the useless ANC in mind when he said: “You must not turn aside, for then you would go after futile things which cannot profit or deliver, because they are futile.”

What has the ANC ever delivered? I rest my case.


28 July 2016

Merkel still insists on integrating Muslims into European society

By Mike Smith
28th of July 2016

“We can do this”…Merkel about Muslim invasion of Europe one year ago.

“We can do this” …Merkel today after the Muslim terrorist attacks in Germany.

Merkel, Despite Attacks and Critics, Renews Vow to Integrate Migrants

You have to wonder if this woman has rocks for brains or whether she is in on the act. I will go with the second option, because in my opinion she is a Communist sleeper.

Muslims will NEVER integrate in Europe. They view Christians and Europeans with disgust because Europeans eat pork, drink alcohol and allow their women to dress how they like.

A year ago I spelled out my ten concerns about the Muslim invasion of Europe in which I said that these people cannot just enter Germany uncontrolled.

Now...Joachim Herrmann, the Bavarian interior minister, insisted that the policy of allowing migrants to enter the country unscreened must be stopped, in a direct challenge to the existing policy of Ms. Merkel’s government.

“There can no longer be uncontrolled entry into the country,” said Mr. Herrmann

No shit Sherlock...bit late now don't you think? You already allowed 2 million of them in, what difference is another 2 million going to make?

Rather go knock on the door of the Pope in the Vatican and ask him to declare a Holy Crusade. That is the only way you are going to stop this invasion and turn it back.



Rape culture? What rape culture?

By Mike Smith
28th of July 2016

I always wondered how they got that smell up there.

Kwa-Zulu Natal man gets 12 year sentence for raping wife with fish can

What amazes me is how our judges can still remain objective when they have to hear such cases on a daily basis. I am sure every judge and prosecutor in this country can write a book on all the strange stuff they have come across dealing with these savages.

But that is not all. Take note of how the media buries a child rape case in the same story further down when they refer to: “In a separate incident, a 26-year-old man was sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and kidnapping of an 11-year-old girl. He dragged her into the nearby bushes and raped her.“

See? Just by the way…another child was raped. Nothing new. Move on.

And then this one 53yo man raped an 11-year-old girl, and gave her R10 to keep quiet about it

Then two months ago Judge Mabel Jansen was suspended for saying that there is a rape culture amongst blacks. Damn right there is. Underground rape culture does exists Khayelitsha woman says

Behind the bad weather. Major conspiracy uncovered

By Mike Smith
27th of July 2016

Currently the country is being swept away by bad weather and storms…

Snow, floods and now a Tornado

…But fear not. The conspiracy has been uncovered. We know who the culprits are:













25 July 2016

Judge Chris Jafta says Afrikaner culture belongs to the dustbin of history


By Mike Smith
25th of July 2016

What never ceases to amaze/amuse me is how the Afrikaner, after his virtual political Hara-Kiri in ’94 is fighting a daily trench battle against the leftist spawn of Satan who is not content with the political kick-to-the-curb of the disarmed, disenfranchised and ten-to-one outnumbered white minority, but want him totally eighty-sixed off the menu of cultures in South Africa.

Case in point is the group of unionists and activists collectively known as Soliforum (Solidarity and Afriforum) that seems to be struggling from one long court battle against the Marxist ANC to the next in defense of what should be constitutional imperatives.

Afriforum wins court battle over University of the Free State language policy

Maybe I missed something about the dead terrorist Mandela’s triple-negative promise of a New (Improved) South Africa when he said that “Never, never and never again shall it be that this beautiful land will again experience the oppression of one by another.”

…Or maybe I just understood "oppression" wrong, because 22 years later, the already marginalized Afrikaner is experiencing the boot of oppression stomping down on his face on a daily basis. Why should Afrikaners still have to go to court to defend their constitutional right to be educated in their mother tongue at their own universities?

Take for instance the recent case that Soliforum lost about the cultural genocide of changing Afrikaner street and place names in Pretoria and Constitutional Court Judge, Christopher Jafta, said afterwards in an article on Politicsweb that Afrikaner Culture belongs in the dustbin of history

It is a long article of saying everything from mostly nothing to sweet blue buggerall. You can read it if you can stomach his subjective drivel, but the gist is like this.

“You Afrikaners are all racist and oppressive scum who brought nothing good to South Africa and should therefore sit down, shut the fuck up and take your beating you deserve. Your culture is evil and inherently racist and should therefore be wiped off the face of the earth.”

There. Took me four lines to say what the learned judge took four months to write.

Of course, apart from being an Affirmative Action nobody who in his own words were promoted too rapidly from a rural Transkei court interpreter to ConCourt judge, Judge Chris Jafta is also an idiot with a long history of embarrassing and controversial decisions often not supported by his colleagues and described by senior advocates as "awful" and "inexplicable".

He is also a backpedalling coward who cannot face up to his decisions that led to charges of gross misconduct when judge Hlope asked him to rule in favour of president Zuma and the Constitutional Court laid a public complaint against Hlophe which Jafta and his equally stupid sidekick Nkabinde supported. This was just the start of what became known as the “Hlope circus”.

Six years later Jafta and Nkabinde went up against themselves in court saying their own complaint was not legally valid. They were nailed by legal commentators for bringing the Constitutional Court into disrepute.

The High Court dismissed the judges' application in 2014, but Dumb and Dummerer appealed. The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed that appeal in 2016, criticizing Jafta and Nkabinde's damaging court application and implying that the case raised questions about their "integrity".

On 6 April 2016, Jafta and Nkabinde filed an appeal to the Constitutional Court – their own court – asking it to overturn the Supreme Court of Appeal's judgment saying that the SCA made "hurtful" imputations about them.

All this despite the fact that the Constitutional Court already held in 2012 that it cannot hear appeals in the Hlophe matter and that any SCA judgment was final.

See, the point? They don’t even know how the legal system and the courts work, but they want to be constitutional judges. Clearly the Roman Dutch law system is too advanced and wasted on them. They would be better off as elders ruling in a tribal judgment somewhere in a Bundu court held in a grass hut in rural Transkei.

Now according to the cultural relativists and the racial egalitarians, both law systems are equal, western lawyers and tribal elders are equal and western doctors and Sangomas are equal.

This brings us to another one of those great contradictions of the learned left who believe that “Equality before the law” means something different than that all people, rich and poor, clever or stupid are subject to the same laws of justice and “Due process”.

In fact, Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that "All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law."

Of course in the case of South Africa we know this is bullshit considering Zuma’s rape case, the 783 cases of corruption against him, the Nkandla ruling and of course Hlaudi Motsoeneng’s uttering’s that Zuma is somehow special.

I think it is safe to say that the justice system of the New (improved) South Africa is a farce. Nevertheless, the belligerent multiculturalists like the learned Judge Jafta believes that people are indeed all equal as far physical and mental abilities are concerned.

Now I don’t know if this equality thing is true in the insect world; I know for a fact it is not true amongst cats and dogs and it is certainly not true amongst my own people, the whites of South Africa. Why should equality then be found across races?

In a true test of the Infinite Monkey theorem these libtards believe that given the same environment, the same resources and enough time, anyone can be a Shakespeare, a Mozart or Da Vinci…and of course, that all cultures are the same…except that the White Western Culture is always worse and the Afrikaner culture only worthy of the dustbin of history.

So ultimately the judge, with his strong feelings about Afrikaans culture, in some perverse way, agrees with me that relativism is bullshit and all cultures are not the same and do not have equal worth.

Somewhere along the line one needs a standard to which one measures, otherwise five equals six, and in my culture that standard is the right to life and the protection of individual rights.

Now when I compare the white Afrikaner culture to Judge Jafta’s Xhosa culture where a woman’s worth is measured in cows (Lobola), where young girls are abducted and ritually raped by much older men to make them their wives (Ukutwala) and where young boys are genitally mutilated with rusty blades (Ulwaluko) to the point where their willies drop off from gangrene, then I must confess that the Afrikaner culture, with all its faults, measured to the standard of life and individual freedom is far superior to that of the culture of the educated Noble Savage, Judge Jafta.

But this brings us to another irony and that is that the same culture that gave Noble Savage Christopher Jafta his first name and his primitive ilk the opportunity to educate themselves by building schools and universities for them and by simply showing them writing, arithmetic and the concept of the wheel to catapult them from the Stone Age into modern society, is now the culture that he criticizes, hates and wants to relegate to the dustbin of history.

However, Jafta’s culture is the “Leitkultur” in South Africa (at least at the moment)…but it is a topsy-turvy artificial creation that is giving him a false sense of security like the levees of New Orleans gave the citizens of Louisiana a false sense of security during Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and just like it happened with the mighty Mississippi, the river of history also has a way of finding its natural course and sweeping artificial constructions away.

The wheel turns slowly, but it turns and Judge Jafta should be careful that his culture does not suffer in the near future what he wished on the Afrikaner culture yesterday.

24 July 2016

What really happened to those political snakes of the National Party?

By Mike Smith
25th of July 2016

Not a day goes by without some black politician or liberal white idiot in the media uttering blatant lies and hate-speech against Afrikaners and their history. This past weekend it was our illustrious über-racist president Jacob Zuma (again) in the Eastern Cape when he said that that blacks should not vote for the DA, because The DA is the spawn of the National Party and likened them to snakes:

Said Zuma. “When a snake, a poisonous one, gives birth, it gives birth to another snake. How can you vote for people who don't know you and who you don't know?”

Look I am no friend of the DA, but of course Zuma forgot to mention the snakes in his midst, because when the New NP disbanded in 2005 the ANC absorbed them all, not the DA.

ANC Caucus
With effect from the 5th August 2005, every single one of the NNP members of parliament became members of the ANC, in accordance with the system of crossing the floor in South Africa, which allowed politicians, elected on one party ticket, to defect to other parties or becoming independents. And they are still there albeit under the radar: Martinus van Schalkwyk, Pik Botha, André Gaum, Renier Schoeman, etc.

Don't just look at the black ministers that the ANC use as a front. Behind them you have all those deputy ministers and deputy directors general...All former NP snakes working for the ANC today.

Nevertheless the philandering sexist, rapist and polygamist Zuma even praised the young women wearing “doeks” (head scarves) in the audience and said he loved seeing them all dressed up.

Amazingly none of the hypocritical LWB’s in the Feminazi brigade said a word about that.

A convivial atmosphere prevailed, with supporters clearly lapping up Zuma's every word. He closed with his signature rendition of the "Umshini Wami" (Bring me my machine gun, so I can shoot the cowardly whites) struggle song before a performance by hip-hop artist AKA.

22 July 2016

Eastern Cape Blacks exonerate Apartheid. Saying Apartheid was better



By Mike Smith
22th of July 2016

It is not often that you hear this kind of objectivity from blacks:

"We shot ourselves in the foot by toppling the apartheid government‚" residents of an Eastern Cape village said on Thursday.

We were better off under Apartheid Timeslive, Malibongwe Dayimani, 21 Juli, 2016

Last I heard this kind of objectivity was when the Zulu king said the same.
Zulu King slams South African democracy; says Apartheid was better

But I guess things must be pretty bad if the Blacks in the ANC’s former stronghold of the Eastern Cape are admitting that they were better off under Apartheid.

“Tsholomnqa villagers had been waiting for a tarred road and decent houses for decades"‚ said community leader‚ Wele Ntshongola.”

Decades? Two long decades? You have been voting ANC continuously for two long decades and hoped, believed and trusted this spawn of Satan would deliver? Tell me something, Wele…why do you get upset when whites call you stupid?

I often get some liberal twats on here who say that Apartheid was evil, oppressed the blacks and the Chief Ministers of the Homelands were all corrupt.

I don’t know. Maybe they were corrupt. Show me one Sub-Saharan country where blacks are in charge that is NOT corrupt. However acknowledging that they were all corrupt should then be a clear sign that they were not fit to govern in the first place. So when are liberals going to apologise for betting on the wrong horse?

Continued Wele Ntshongola…"This village was in a good state under the Ciskei homeland led by LL (Lenox) Sebe. We used to have a tarred road... with workers who used to maintain it as well as free seed‚ crops and livestock." He said they celebrated when democracy dawned. "Little did we know that democracy would bring more oppression.”

"I am not saying that I agree with the policies or laws of apartheid‚ but at least we were getting service delivery back then." Ntshongola said.

Tja...you criticized the part without understanding the whole. You chucked the baby out with the bathwater and raised a monster. Now you complain?

Maybe, just maybe it is, Mr Ntshongola, that you never understood those policies of Apartheid properly. Anytime you want me to explain it to you, drop me a line.

See, the Apartheid government didn’t lie to blacks like the liberals and socialist do. We were honest with you and told you the truth.

The liberals and socialists lied to you. Their starting point was and still is that there are no differences between whites and blacks when simple observations tell us differently.

The Apartheid government acknowledged the differences in culture, in language, in beliefs and values of all the tribes of South Africa and acknowledged their rights to rule themselves and preserve their languages and cultures which are to a large extent distinct and sui generis.

The creation of the homelands of Ciskei, Transkei, Bop and Venda, etc, was not much different to what the Americans and Canadians did with the creation of the Indian and Eskimo Reservations. In those countries those policies were considered “Progressive”, why should it be different in SA?

In those countries they forcibly moved the Indians en masse to these reservation far away from their original lands, whereas in South Africa we created the black homelands on the soil the blacks picked out for themselves and settled themselves and we had more success than the USA and Canada as far as the protection of minorities and development of these homelands were concerned.

Instead of a “melting pot model” where all minorities were expected to speak one language (English) and where the American Negro lost his original culture and language in what can only be considered a “Cultural Genocide”, Apartheid South Africa insisted on mother tongue education for all groups in at least the primary school level and preserved the languages and cultures of South African blacks.

Today the Xhosa culture and language is intact, because of Apartheid, not despite of it. The same for the Zulu culture, the Venda, the Sotho, etc.

Surely then our system of Apartheid or “Separate Development” should have been considered even MORE progressive than that of the USA or Canada. If you break it down, Separate Development was based on the science of Anthropology, classical Western Liberalism and the Christian values of “live and let live”, “empathy” and “fairness”.

Apartheid ideologues were not mindless “racists” who opposed the principle of equality and wanted to “oppress” the native. However, bringing about equality brings up the big paradox of the racial egalitarian. Like Professor Stefan Possony (Stanford), the Austrian-born U.S. economist and military strategist who conceived the U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative, popularly known as Star Wars, explained: “If the principle of equality is to be implemented in a realistic and not in a purely legal manner, it calls for “unequal” measures.”

See, it works like this…If two people are to be given equal opportunities and if one person is handicapped while the other person is not, equal opportunity exists only if the handicapped individual is helped more amply and by qualitatively different means. Furthermore, the principle of equality does not apply only to individuals, but also to groups of individuals like ethnic groups.

Thus, if one group is “behind” or handicapped while the other is not, the trailing group must be helped more amply; and if the two groups are different in attitude and aptitude, they require differential types of assistance. Legislation that distinguishes between groups does not, because of those distinctions, violate the equality principle, but may implement it: e.g. a progressive tax is unequal treatment for a strictly egalitarian objective.

In the 1960’s South Africa stood accused before the International Court of Justice for “oppressing” and “exploiting” the natives, the judges, although they might not have agreed with Apartheid, after hearing South Africa’s case, disregarded the accusations which, for that matter, were dropped by the applicants themselves. The applicants then changed their strategy and tried to build a case on current world trends and world opinions instead of facts...and failed miserably. The court threw their case out.

Based on the 3000 pages of irrefutable evidence, in 1966, the Apartheid government was found NOT GUILTY by the ICJ of oppressing and exploiting any blacks in or of South Africa.

You want to see "Exploitation", Mr. Ntshongola??

Do you know where the International Court of Justice is? It is in The Hague in the Netherlands. I have been there. Do you know what else you will find in The Hague? There is a surviving document , a letter from Peter Schaghen, the original of which is held by the Rijksarchief in The Hague, showing how the Dutch bought Manhattan from the Lenape (Delaware) Indians for 60 Guilders back in 1624, drove them off their lands, and killed them off either by gun or smallpox. In 1630 they also bought Staten Island for another 60 Guilders. There is your exploitation.

How the Dutch bought Manhattan and Staten Island

Yes…these same hypocritical Dutch who criticized us South Africans for “exploiting blacks”, who formed the Dutch Anti Apartheid Movement and assisted the ANC, who is today destroying South Africa; destroying the various cultures and languages of South Africa…bought Manhattan for 60 Guilders. Today they are also waking up and seeing that South Africa and Apartheid wasn't so bad after all.

Besides what is exploitation? This concept of “exploitation” which is bandied about frequently by Liberal idiots is derived from dubious Marxian economics.

Apartheid South Africa had real economic policies such as the “Small Business Development Corporation” which helped blacks to become successful business people. And many did. Many became millionaires. The entire black taxi industry was created as such. Was that “exploitation”?

The South African policy of “Separate and equal development” (Apartheid) was not there to legalize exploitation, but to prevent and suppress it. The objective was to foster the economic development of ALL groups living in the Republic, not the development of one group at the expense of the other.

One of the major objectives of Apartheid was not to racially discriminate against anybody, but to eradicate racial discrimination. In a homogenous society where people vote for their own and rule themselves there cannot be any “racism”; There cannot be any “exploitation” of one race by another. This was exactly the reason for the homelands.

Sure Apartheid was not perfect. No political system is. Liberals were often fascinated by minor incidents of petty Apartheid and laid traps to make it look ridiculous, but forgot that any policy has its costs and penalties and yes, there were defects. The South African “Blueprint” for Apartheid was not complete and many procedures and solutions were tested experimentally. Some situations were unique and others very unpredictable; Some officious bureaucrats and “Stasieblompotte” interpreted regulations by the letter instead of by common sense, but that will always be so. We are only human.

Be it as it may, there is every reason to criticize mistakes, because criticism is the first step on the road to improvement, but the criticism is not valid unless it is derived from full comprehension of the overall facts and holistic observation of the entire system. The part cannot be criticized effectively if the whole is not seen, let alone understood.

You see, Mr. Ntshongola...What you blacks did was to reject Apartheid without understanding it. Now you have the ANC and you call them worse than Apartheid as if Apartheid was something bad, yet you long back to the days of Apartheid when you had excellent infrastructure. How should we whites understand this?

You Mr. Ntshongola, claims the villagers are mostly ANC supporters and should be prioritised by the government. Do you still have hopes that they will? You demonstrated at their offices, but they ignored you. They have ignored your knocking at their door for 22 years. When are you going to kick the damn door down?

You now have to buy gravel to fix the roads yourself, just so that the police, ambulances and fire brigades can reach you in times of need, because the useless ANC has done nothing for you in the past 22 years, yet you support them and vote for them election after election? Why? The mind boggles, Mr. Ntshongola. Is it simply because they have a black skin, because surely it cannot be on merit?

So you tell me Mr. Ntshongola, who are the real mindless “racists” here? And then you wonder why we call you backward, ignorant and stupid Kaffirs?

I will tell you why you are “backwards” Mr. Ntshongola.

It is because you are far behind the times. Look north to your Sub Saharan brothers who are daily fleeing their black run governments in their tens of thousands risking life and limb and scrambling off to white run European countries. By the time you lot in SA wake up, Europe will be full of your central African brethren and there won’t be space for you SA Bantus anymore. You are too far south; too far back. It is like a pyramid scheme; you need to get in first. You need to move it, move it. Gajima, gajima!

BTW…Say “hi” to the Dutch from me.

Just be warned that in Switzerland, Germany and Austria they have already started introducing segregation laws and rules. That’s right. They have Apartheid at swimming pools and trains. Apartheid is coming to Europe fast.

Just a few days ago a 17yo Afghanistani migrant who lived with a white German foster family for a few months since he entered less than a year ago, stabbed and hacked people with a knife and axe on a train near Würzburg in Bavaria after shouting “Allahu Akbar!” (Allah is great). Now the Germans are forcing migrants to wear a pass on them at all times and when stopped by the police they should present it immediately. Failure to do so will result in imprisonment and deportation.

Sounds familiar doesn’t it?

When we did exactly the same in the 1950’s they also called us, “Stupid”, Ignorant” and “Backwards”…. “Dumb Dutchmen” and “White kaffirs”, they called us…And now? Should we call them the same?

Now they can see we were not “backwards”. In fact we were 50-60 years ahead of Europe. We were visionaries. What we have forgotten about Apartheid they must still learn, and are learning more and more every day. Tja,...Manchmal ist Schadenfreude wirklich die schönste Freude.

Just like the blacks in the Eastern Cape are only waking up now and seeing that Apartheid was far better, Europeans will also come to realize very soon that Apartheid will be their only solution, because the other, in the words of Prime Minister John Vorster, is just too ghastly to contemplate.